Sociology A Sociological Perspective - 896 Words

According to the University of North Carolina, â€Å"Sociology is the study of human social relationships and institutions† (http://sociology.unc.edu/undergraduate-program/sociology-major/what-is-sociology/). Sociology is science practiced by everyone in the world, whether they realize it or not. It is not only an incredibly important social science but also a beautiful art to study how society works. Now, an educated sociologist will realize that there are different perspective to view the world through from a sociological perspective. There are three specific views: Structural Functionalist, Conflict Theory, and Symbolic Interactionism. Each has valid points of view, and not completely exclusive to the other, but in this case one is more correct and valid than the others. Conflict theory is the most credible theory in psychology because it factors in the problems of power and broken systems. Sociology is a social science that studies social interactions and changes that happ en in them. With this knowledge it is important that sociology can be viewed in three separate ways that are completely different. The first theory is Structural Functionalism, which views society as a whole in which a person might view a person as a fully functioning machine (Larkin, Chap 2. Par. 5). This view sees society as many parts called structures (Larkin, Chap 2. Par. 5). A second way to view society is the Conflict perspective, which sees society as branches and families that are in constantShow MoreRelatedSociology : A Sociological Perspective1292 Words   |  6 PagesOrigins of Sociology Ashley Drees Ivy Tech Community College Professor Brosmer April 10,2016 What is Sociology Sociology  is the  study of  social behavior or society, including its origins, development, organization, networks, and institutions. Sociology is a social science that uses various methods of empirical investigation and critical analysis to develop a body of knowledge about social order, disorder, and change. Three Main Theoretical Perspectives in Sociology Functional Perspective ConflictRead MoreThe Sociological Perspective Of Sociology874 Words   |  4 PagesThe Sociological Perspective Sociology is the scientific study of society and human behavior. Human behavior and each respective society that is studied can be evaluated and governed by the scientific method to produce reliable results. The inquiries into these subjects are derived by the inspirations of sociological perspectives. Each stratifying field of Sociology finds an anchor in the relationships between these pieces in the human context in which they are found. Navigating the water inRead MoreSociology : A Sociological Perspective1053 Words   |  5 PagesSociology is the study of society and social lives and forces that influence people and shape the construction of society their lives. It also gives us an awareness of cultural difference that allows us to see the social world from many perspectives. (Sutton 2013). Sociology perspectives are overview of human behaviour and its connection to society as a whole. A sociological theory is a set of ideas explain how society or aspects of society work and there are many variations of the basic theoriesRead MoreThe Sociological Perspective Of Sociology963 Words   |  4 PagesAfter a careful study and a deeper research on an introduction to sociology, I have come to understand that no problem can be solved well enough if one does not have the sociological perspective which is defined as a way of looking at the world through a sociological lens. In fact, there is the need of the lens that wil l help one to view situations and have the eye to emerge through different views to solve that problem. This mirror has become a doorway that will help one to have a beginner’s mindRead MoreTheoretical Perspectives On Sociology And Sociological Perspectives1357 Words   |  6 PagesTheoretical Perspectives in Sociology In the world of sociology there are many different ways that humans interact with the world. Although we are all human beings, we do not always see the world the same way that others do. Even though not many are aware of the different ways they can see the world, there are three sociological perspectives. Using structural functionalism, the conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism one will be able to decide which view best represents the way they see thisRead MoreSociology : A Sociological Perspective2031 Words   |  9 PagesSociology refers to the study of a society’s structure, development, collective behaviors, and functions, which delves into examining social institutions and social relations. Sociology may also be termed as â€Å"a scientific way of thinking about society and its influence on human groups,† (Andersen Taylor, 2007, p. 2). Society, on the other hand, refers to people who share norms, traditions, values, and laws as well as live together as an organized community. Sociology is important in understandingRead MoreTheoretical Frameworks Of Sociology And Sociological Perspective Essay918 Words   |  4 Pages What does Sociology have to do with me? Why do people think or act differently than you? Why are some people rich while others are poor? Why do some commit crimes, break laws and others do not? These are all some of the questions students need an answer to, which led them to enrol to this course. â€Å"Sociology is the scientific study of individuals in groups, organizations, cultures and societies; and of the interrelationships of individuals, group, organizations, cultures and societies.† (KennedyRead MoreSocial Deviance : A Sociological Perspective On Deviant And Criminal Behavior Within Sociology1160 Words   |  5 Pagessocieties with norms. Sociological theories of deviance are those that use social context and social pressures to explain deviance. You’ll find these in your readings for this week . Think of the diagram for a functionalist approach to deviance: Great post! You did a nice job defining deviance as a whole. A theory closely associated with this term is labeling theory. Labeling theory is one of the most important approaches to understanding deviant and criminal behavior within sociology. Labeling theoryRead MoreEssay on The Sociological Imagination1389 Words   |  6 PagesMy personal condensed definition of â€Å"the sociological imagination† is that it is the idea one should be aware of the societal structures around themselves, and how those structures can influence a person and vice-versa. In addition, I think that having a â€Å"sociological imagination† also involves a deep appreciation for the importance of society and culture. Consequently, for a person that has completed a basic introduction to sociology college course and actually paid attention, I would hope thatRead MoreWhat Is Sociology?1062 Words   |  5 PagesWhat is sociology? We can start by saying that sociology is the systematic study of human society. Sociology should be more than you find in a good documentary on a social issue. It is certainly more than listings of facts and figures about society. Instead it becomes a form of consciousness a way of thinking, a critical way of seeing the social. Seeing the general in the particular. In his short book ‘Invitation to Sociology’(1963) characterized the sociological perspective as seeing the general

Is the Death Penalty Justified - 1824 Words

Is the Death Penalty Justified? Jessica Valentine PHI 103 Informal Logic Professor Stephen Carter March 20, 2012 Is the Death Penalty Justified? The death penalty will always be a topic some people refuse to talk about. When in fact, it is a very serious topic and people should know how and why the death penalty is not justified. I believe the death penalty is not justified in the least bit because there are people sitting up in prison just living life because the state does not want to pay for an execution, or they find it to be morally corrupt. Personally if you committed a crime that resulted in someone dying then you deserves to die as well. The idea of killing another human does not sit well with people and that is mainly the†¦show more content†¦The argument on who are we to have the power to kill someone who has been sentenced to the death penalty play a major role in most people’s life because we ultimately decide their fate. Some would say that only God should be allowed to decide the fate of every single person, and yes this is true by all means. So therefore, we shoul d not be allowed to determine who and when a person should be sentenced to death. Another argument a person who is against the death penalty would have is they will get what they deserve in the end. In other words karma will get them so to speak. When bad people do bad things they will have bad things come back to them whether when they get sentenced to jail or they die an untimely death. People who are opposed to the death penalty just feel as if people will get what they deserve. The feel as if once a person gets locked up he or she shall be imprisoned for life and have to rot in a cell until they die and with this hopefully they will see what they did was wrong and why they are where they are for a reason. With this comes the idea that people who care to much for human life think that if a person spends the rest of their life in prison instead of being put to death they will learn their lesson while they sit in prison. Yes, some do learn many life lessons while in prison most inm ates who wentShow MoreRelatedIs Death Penalty Justified?995 Words   |  4 Pages995 Is Death Penalty Justified? Death penalty is the capital punishment given to the person where a person is put to death who has done crime or involved in a crime. It is for those people who is doing the crime intentionally. It is given by the government to the traitors, murderer and so on. The sentence is vindicated by the type of offense committed. There are certain conditions where a death penalty can be correct and should be consider Justified by the government. The death penalty guaranteesRead MoreThe Death Penalty Is Justified1346 Words   |  6 Pagespast and recent years, the death penalty has remained a huge debate between individuals that agree or disagree whether the death penalty is justifiable punishment or not. Is capital punishment truly a justified and powerful approach to the violations of specific prisoners? Many individuals believe that having the death penalty is cruel and inhumane. Others believe that people who commit such heinous crimes should be punished with the death penalty. Insti lling the death penalty is the same as saying â€Å"eyeRead MoreThe Death Penalty Is Justified1534 Words   |  7 Pagesit is ethical to kill a convicted criminal. People who oppose the death penalty often argue mistaken identity and wrongful conviction. They argue that long-term imprisonment is the better course of action, because it allows for the possibility that if a mistake was made in the conviction of a suspect, they would be able to correct it without ending the life of an innocent person. They also state that the threat of the death penalty is not a deterrent and people will commit crimes regardless, as oftenRead MoreThe Death Penalty Is Justified1828 Words   |  8 PagesThe Death Penalty Daniel Heydari Professor Sheldon Philosophy 262-0 12 October 2015 1.) The author of this letter, submitted to the New York Times, claims that the death penalty is wholly and morally justified, seeing as its existence results in the lessening of violent deaths and gun use due to the perpetrator’s fear of killing a person in haste and thus being given the death penalty. 2.) The author argues his claim of the death penalty being justified as a means of punishment for violent crimesRead MoreThe Death Penalty Is Justified923 Words   |  4 Pagespilots who also had to bomb innocents to win the war,† (Gorman). More recently, a common trend has been the disapproval of the death penalty, exhibited by the thirteen percent drop in the number of people on death row since Spring of 2005 (Death Penalty Info. Center). Life without parole has become the preferred sentence of unavoidable capital punishment. The death penalty has frequently been viewed as inhumane. However, isn’t lack of remorse for such vile acts inhumane? In cases of intentional murderRead MoreThe Death Penalty Is Justified1143 Words   |  5 PagesAllison Shu 2/25/16 Period 2 Objective paper on the death penalty Capital punishment is legally authorized killing as punishment for a crime. The death penalty questions the morality of killing a person as justification for their crime. It also brings to question whether the death penalty actually serves as a deterrent for crime, and that some of the people executed are found innocent afterwards. The debates over the constitutionality of the death penalty and whether capital punishment should be usedRead MoreThe Death Penalty Is Justified995 Words   |  4 PagesThe Death penalty has been a controversial topic for many years and recently the debate about it has been getting bigger and bigger to where at some point soon a decision will have to be made. Many people will disagree with the death penalty because it goes against their moral beliefs, this is thought process is seen more in the northern states. However, here in the south the death penalty is strongly believed in by most, but who is put to death and why? Did they deserve this sentence or were theyRead MoreThe Death Penalty Is Justified1603 Words   |  7 PagesTHE DEATH PENALTY Many nations have criminals to punish, but what’s changing is how they punish their criminals. Most countries, even some states, have come to the realization that the death penalty is an unfair, inhumane, unconstitutional, and irreversible punishment that’s much too severe and is an unfit punishment for a fair and just society. Internationally, the U.S. ranks fifth in terms of the number of prisoners put to death, putting America in such ill-esteemed company as the regimesRead MoreThe Death Penalty Is Justified858 Words   |  4 PagesSince the foundation of our nation the Death Penalty has been a way to punish prisoners that have committed heinous crimes, however since the turn of the 20th century the practice of Capital Punishment has been questioned on its usage in America and the world as a whole. The Death Penalty is used in America to punish criminals who have committed murders, or taken the life of an innocent person, and while the death penalty seems like it is doing justice to those who have killed others it is actuallyRead MoreThe Death Penalty Is Justified1463 Words   |  6 PagesIn many eyes across the country the death penalty is widely criticized. The state of Texas has the death penalty, whereas nineteen other states in the United States do not including the state Maine. The death penalty is a way for the states to declare that they don’t tolerate the heinous crimes that some individuals commit. In Texas there are numerous ways that one could be sentenced to death row. Murdering a police officer or firefighter in the line of duty and if the individual knowing that they

Business Law of ASIC v Adler Samples for Students †MyAssignmenthelp.c

Question: Discuss about the Duty Of Care And Diligence ASIC v Adler. Answer: Issues As already said director have a number of duties to the companies and accordingly, they may also be held accountable for the breach of such duties. It is due to the position of immense power that they hold that the directors are also given huge responsibilities and a great degree of accountability. Directors are also deemed to stand in a fiduciary relationship with the company because the fate of the company depends to a great extent on the directors. Even a small breach of their duties may prove disastrous for the company, and all the stakeholders involved in it, as a whole. The case started off in earnest in 2000 when the company of Pacific Eagle Equity Pty Ltd (PEE) received a loan to the tune of $ 10 million from the HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd (HIHC). The loan was not documented, neither was it secured. Things took an interesting turn when the aspect of the involvement of Adler was inspected. With regard to HIHC Adler held two positions. One he was a non-executive director of HIHC and secondly he held a large number of shares of HIHC through a company by the name of Adler Corporation Ltd. PEE was again a company directly under the control of Adler and the company subsequent to the loan, also became a trustee of the Australian Equities Unit Trust (AEUT). Later on, the loan amount secured by PEE was used by the company to buy AEUT units which, subsequently were sold at a loss. This action was done simply to keep up the charade that PEE, as a company, was economically still viable (ASIC v Adler (2002) 171 NSWSC). Law These in brief are the duties of the directors of a company. Directors hold a key position in the company and as a result thereof they have to take many important and essential decisions on behalf of a company. To enable such decision making and to ensure that directors are able to wield their powers effectively, and not merely customarily, directors are given immense autonomy as well. However, as is wont, too much of power and autonomy concentrated in the hands of a director would lead to the invariable scope of misuse of such powers. To prevent such misuse, the law itself has envisaged several checks and balances which are discussed below. The Corporations Act, 2001 has spent copious amount provisions on the matter of directors duties and liabilities to a corporation. The first such duty may be said to be contained in section 180 which lays down in sub-section (1) that it is the duty of a director to act carefully and diligently. This duty is self-explanatory because it is natural and obvious that a director shall have such a duty. Sub-section (2) contains the business judgment rule. According to this rule, the director of a company may not be held liable for any decision that they may have taken with regard to the conduct of the affairs of the business, provided that such decision was taken in good faith and for legitimate purposes. One more requirement is that the judgment should not have been influenced by personal factors and/or interests Sally Ann Burrows, ["Directors' Duties (1St Edition)20102Andrew Keay. Directors' Duties (1St Edition). Jordan Publishing Limited, 2009. 476Pp." (2010) 52 International Journal ofL aw and Management. ] The next duty is enumerated in section 181 which says that it is incumbent upon a director to act in good faith and for valid purposes. This section may be said to be a legislative extension of section 180(2). Section 182 says that it is mandatory for the directors to not use their positions for any illegal or questionable purpose. Basically this duty makes it illegal for the directors to sue their positions in any manner so that they may get an undue or unwarranted advantage to the detriment of the company. The advantage is not limited to the directors only but top any other person, provided there is the involvement of the director. Again section 183 says that the director should not use in an improper or objectionable or questionable way any information that the director may have received simply by virtue of being a director. Improper usage of information implies gaining an undue advantage either for self or for someone else or causing an unwarranted loss to the company through the usage of such information(Rosemary Teele Langford, "The Duty Of Directors To Act Bona Fide In The Interests Of The Company: A Positive Fiduciary Duty? Australia And The UK Compared" (2011) 11 Journal of Corporate Law Studies). Ultimately section 260A of the Corporations Act, 2001 forbids a company from monetarily helping a person in the process of procuring or acquiring shares in such company or in any of its holding company. As is evident from the above, the main agenda of having so many checks and balances on the powers of the directors is to protect the interests of the company. In fact, a director for the continued progress and development of a company, financial and otherwise, and all other stakeholders involved, thus if the director himself does any act which contributes to the detriment of a company, thelawlaw provides for methods to prevent that and also to bring those responsible for the detriment to book [John H Farrar, Corporate Governance In Australia And New Zealand (Oxford University Press, 1st ed, 2001]. Application To decide upon whether Adler is guilty or not, it is pertinent that we apply the duties enlisted above to the given case. Turning to the first duty, Adler was in direct breach and contravention of that duty. Adlers actions may be said to be anything but careful and diligent. He was instrumental in procuring that loan to PEE, but there was no corresponding document or security in support of that loan. Basically, Adler acted in such a manner that HIHC lent an exorbitant amount of $ 10 million to PEE without any proof or evidence to that effect. To top it off, of that $ 10 million, $ 4 million was reportedly squandered off. Simply going by the yardstick of a reasonable and careful person, one may conclude that no reasonable and careful person would have allowed that loan, let alone a loan without security (Mina W.M. Yip, "Challenging The Role And Duty Of Directors In High Profile Corporate Failures In The USA And Europe In The Wake Of Financial Crisis - Possible Allegations Against Board Of Directors For Breach Of Duty Of Care, Skill And Diligence?" (2015) 1 EuroMed J. of Management). The next duty is to act according to the business judgment rule. In the course of the hearing of this case Justice Santow held the opinion that to determine the reasonableness of Adlers actions they may be judged against the action a reasonable and prudent man would have taken in Adlers place. But, the business judgment rule was held to be inapplicable in Adlers case because Adler had a clash of interest in this case considering Adlers involvement in both HIHC and PEE. The test with regard to section 181 may be said to be rather subjective because the test is to be done from the point of view of a director himself. In many cases it might happen that the decision taken by a director may actually end up acting harming a company, however, in such cases the director may escape liability by proving that he had actually acted in good faith and for genuine purposes for the company, however, his actions had backfired. Thus, this section must be applied keeping the full facts and circumstances of the case in mind and not merely the ultimate outcome of the directors actions. With regard to this case, if we were to consider the full facts and circumstances of the case, it must be borne in mind that Adler was acted in complete clash of interest between himself and HIHC. Therefore his actions can never be said to be in good faith (ASIC v Rich (2009) 1229 NSWSC.) With regard to section 182, Adler may be said to have breached this section to the maximum possible extent. He fully misused his position as a director of HIHC. Firstly, Adler had not disclosed his interest in the impugned transaction to HIHC, thereby losing his defense of good faith, secondly, by misusing his position as director of HIHC he ensured and mobilized a loan for PEE that to without an iota of proof to that effect. Thereby, through these actions it is rather clear that Adler had misused his position as a director massively and totally. His actions had caused undue and unwarranted damage and loss to the HIHC and undue gain to himself. He had also failed in his duties as the director of PEE because the ultimate beneficiary of the $ 10 million loan was not even PEE but Adler himself indirectly through the Adler Corporation [Joshua George, The Duty Of Care And Diligence (Talomin Books, 1st ed, 2004)]. With regard to section 183, again Adler may be said to have acted in blatant disregard of this section. This section mandates that directors should not make improper use of the information that such person may have received in their capacity as director of a company. Adler had much information in his hand, which, as a director of a company, he should have disclosed to the company. Instead he chose to keep such information simply to himself and use it for his selfish ends. The greatest example of such a perfidious act on the part of Adler may be said to be his decision of not disclosing his clash of interest in HIHC and also his position in PEE. Such acts of non-disclosure and willful withholding of information gives rise to the assumption that Adlers intentions were not honest or above board and thus he did not have the best interests of the corporation in mind while acting. Finally, we come to section 260A which forbids a company from assisting a person monetarily so that such person may procure or acquire shares in a company or a holding of that company. Of course, there are certain exceptions to this rule. If we were to look at it strictly, HIHC did not help a person directly. To that end, Alder did not provide financial assistance to any person directly or singly. What he did was he acted as a catalyst and facilitated the providing of loan to PEE by HIHC. But through PEE, and then through Adler Corporation, the ultimate beneficiary of the loan was Adler himself and the ultimate losers, in this whole complex web of transactions were HIHC and its stakeholders (J. W. Shaw, "Company Directors: Ethical And Public Interest Responsibilities" (2001) 73 AQ: Australian Quarterly). Therefore, from the above it may be clearly and unequivocally realized that Adler had acted in clear and gross contravention of the duties of a director. Such contravention was not in respect of only one or two duties, but rather a host of duties. Conclusion The above facts and circumstances of the case should serve as a lesson for all directors and potential directors of a company that their ultimate duty must always be towards the company only and not to anybody else. Not even them. As a result of his misdemeanor, Adler had to receive heavy penalties. He was held to be disqualified to be a director for 20 years was put under imprisonment for 5 years and was also fined the amount of about $ 400,000. One interesting observation that may be made in this case is that though the loan was provided at the behest of Adler and was provided without and security or any document, thereby effectively provided without any proof, yet Adler was implicated in this case. This merely goes on to prove the truth of the adage that there is no escape from law. it also teaches that the position of a director is not a position of only power and discretion. It is a position which comes with responsibilities and a duty of trust and good faith to the company and its shareholders. Thus, a director must always remain vigilant and honest, not only to the company, but to himself as well. References Asic v Adler (2002) 171 NSWSC ASIC v Rich (2009) 1229 NSWSC Burrows, Sally Ann, "Directors' Duties (1St Edition)20102Andrew Keay. Directors' Duties (1St Edition). Jordan Publishing Limited, 2009. 476Pp." (2010) 52 International Journal ofLaw and Management Farrar, John H, Corporate Governance In Australia And New Zealand (Oxford University Press, 1st ed, 2001) George, Joshua, The Duty Of Care And Diligence (Talomin Books, 1st ed, 2004) Langford, Rosemary Teele, "The Duty Of Directors To Act Bona Fide In The Interests Of The Company: A Positive Fiduciary Duty? Australia And The UK Compared" (2011) 11 Journal of Corporate Law Studies Shaw, J. W., "Company Directors: Ethical And Public Interest Responsibilities" (2001) 73 AQ: Australian Quarterly Yip, Mina W.M., "Challenging The Role And Duty Of Directors In High Profile Corporate Failures In The USA And Europe In The Wake Of Financial Crisis - Possible Allegations Against Board Of Directors For Breach Of Duty Of Care, Skill And Diligence?" (2015) 1 EuroMed J. of Management

Odysseus, The Hero The Odyssey Is An Epic Story That Has Been A Signif

Odysseus, the Hero The Odyssey is an epic story that has been a significant piece of literature since it wasfirst composed and will remain so for ages to come. One of the reasons it has been so isbecause of the hero, Odysseus. Odysseus is one of the first Greek mythic heroes renowned for his brain as well as hismuscle. He is a man with an intelligent mind, and he is also a man with outstandingbravery. I also must not forget that he is a top-notch athlete which only adds more to thisseemingly insuperable character. It is no wonder why many people refer to Odysseus as apowerful mythic hero.Odysseus often hesitates before acting, because he uses his reason and gift to evaluatethings. This patience is one of his most important additional attributes. This has saved himand his men many of times, and it can be easily seen in various instances throughout histravels such as when he disguised himself as a beggar when he finally reached Ithaca,waiting for the right moment to reveal himself.As g reat as he was, Odysseus still had some weaknesses that prolonged his voyage back toIthaca. His most important weakness that he possess is that of his pride. Pride is good tohave, but in Odysseus' case he had to much of it. This is clearly evident in the episode onthe cyclopes' island. When Odysseus and his men are clearly safe away from the islandOdysseus braggs about his exploit. Polythemus hears this and hurls giant boulders in thedirection of the ship. A couple came very close to sinking the ship. Still that was notenough for Odysseus. Carried away in his pride he unwisely gave away his identity toPolythemus. With that Polythemus called upon his father, Poseidon, to punish the manwho had harmed him. That incident hurt Odysseus more than losing a few men, becausePoseidon made his travel home ever so longer and arduous.Yet another weakness of our hero is his sensualness. Odysseus enjoys women. He stayedwith Circe for one year before his men reminded him of home. He also stayed wit hCalypso for seven years. Although we must take into thought that there were some otherreasons why he stayed with her for so long, like that she was an immortal and he didn'twant to have her against him.Nonetheless, Odysseus survived all that happened to him. His courage, wits, andendurance enabled him to come through each and every difficulty and arrive home safely. Therefor I believe that Odysseus is a hero.